EnigmA Amiga Run 1997 July/EnigmA AMIGA RUN 20 (1997)(G.R. Edizioni)(IT)[!][issue 1997-07 & 08][EAR-CD IV].iso/lightwave/lwmlist/95.lightwave-03/000302_owner-lightwave-l _Sun Mar 12 15:22:33 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-04-09 | 2KB

Return-Path: <owner-lightwave-l>
Received: by mail2.netcom.com (8.6.10/Netcom)
    id MAA21397; Sun, 12 Mar 1995 12:26:44 -0800
Received: from onyx.southwind.net by mail2.netcom.com (8.6.10/Netcom)
    id MAA21332; Sun, 12 Mar 1995 12:26:16 -0800
Received: from localhost (onyx.southwind.net [204.95.83.2]) by onyx.southwind.net (8.6.5/8.6.5) with SMTP id OAA01886 for <[e-mail]>; Sun, 12 Mar 1995 14:22:20 -0600
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 1995 14:22:20 -0600
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
X-Sender: [e-mail]
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: [e-mail]
From: [e-mail] (Brian Schmitt)
Subject: Windows NT memory overhead
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

I keep hearing people saying that NT is bar none the best
choice for Lightwave PC. I think something is being overlooked
in these suggestions, this being that NT requires HUGE amounts
of RAM before it even runs any apps. I personnally have 32 megs
of RAM and am very concerned about the complexity of scenes I
can set up before I start paging to disk. This is a very hard
decision for me to make. While early reports are that NT will
run LW about twice as fast as Windows 3.1x running Win32, I
also know that paging to disk takes 4-5x more time than render-
ing from RAM. Please consider your memory situation before
rushing out to buy NT. I have heard NT itself uses about twelve
megs. Suddenly Windows 3.11 looks pretty good. Could somebody
post actual stats about Windows NT memory usage? Render on all!

Brian Schmitt
PiXcellence Imaging